FireStream 9250 vs TITAN Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 800W)
TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
17632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
TITAN Ada
+9190%
92900
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
1.15TB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
144
800
Shading Units
18432
40
TMUs
576
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
800W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
AD102
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8