FireStream 9250 vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
7392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+2358%
24580
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
64
800
Shading Units
8192
40
TMUs
512
16
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
450W
450 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
22 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
