FirePro S7000 vs H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
+2%
2432
H3C XG310
2381
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Nov 2020
FirePro
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
DG1
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
212 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
