CMP 170HX vs RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 576.0GB/s)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (2550MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
8320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
12630
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+416%
65280
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Aug 2023
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1155 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
100
4480
Shading Units
12800
280
TMUs
400
128
ROPs
176
280
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
72 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
AD102
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
AD102
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
5 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
8.9
N/A
Shader Model
6.7
