CMP 170HX vs FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4400 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+15687%
12630
FirePro 2460 Multi View
80
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
80
280
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
17W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Cedar
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.0
