CMP 170HX vs MTT S50
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 8GB VRAM MTT S50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
MTT S50 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (85W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+156%
12630
MTT S50
4915
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Oct 2023
Mining GPUs
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
70
SM Count
4480
Shading Units
2048
280
TMUs
128
128
ROPs
128
280
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
153.6 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
153.6 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.830 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.915 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
85W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Ampere
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
826 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
8.0
CUDA
N/A
Shader Model
6.5
