CMP 170HX vs FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4440 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+39368%
12630
FirePro 2450 Multi View
32
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
40
280
TMUs
4
128
ROPs
4
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
RV620
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.1