CMP 170HX vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 128.3GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (170W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+867%
12630
GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
1306
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jan 2011
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
8
4480
Shading Units
384
280
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.60 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
54.40 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
170W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GF114
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
2.1
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
