3D Rage IIC PCI vs FireGL V7600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Aug 2007
Rage 2
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
512MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
Shading Units
320
1
TMUs
16
1
ROPs
16
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
127W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
R600
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
R600 GL
Rage 2
Architecture
TeraScale
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
Shader Model
4.0
