3D Rage IIC PCI vs GeForce 8400 GS
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 8400 GS 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
More VRAM (256GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (6.400GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Apr 2007
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
256MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
16
1
TMUs
8
1
ROPs
4
-
L2 Cache
16 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
40W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
G86
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
G86-213-A2
Rage 2
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
-
Shader Model
4.0
