3D Rage IIC PCI vs FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (256GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (16.00GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jun 2007
Rage 2
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
256MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
-
Shading Units
120
1
TMUs
8
1
ROPs
4
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
73W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
RV630
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Rage 2
Architecture
TeraScale
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
Shader Model
4.0
