3D Rage IIC PCI vs NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.00GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Mar 2013
Rage 2
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
1024MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
1
-
Shading Units
48
1
TMUs
8
1
ROPs
4
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
19W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DMS-59
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GF119
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Rage 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
-
Shader Model
5.1
