3D Rage IIC PCI vs Arc A770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A770 's Advantages
Released 25 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Oct 2022
Rage 2
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2100 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
16GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Shading Units
4096
1
TMUs
256
1
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
DG2-512
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Rage 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
Shader Model
6.6
