3D Rage IIC PCI vs GeForce GT 230
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Oct 2009
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
512MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
6
-
Shading Units
48
1
TMUs
24
1
ROPs
16
-
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
G94B
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
Rage 2
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
-
Shader Model
4.0
