3D Rage IIC PCI vs Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 24 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jan 2022
Rage 2
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
4GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Shading Units
768
1
TMUs
48
1
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
DG2-128
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Rage 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
Shader Model
6.6
