Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs H200 SXM

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs H200 SXM

AI GPU We compared a Professional market GPU: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and a GPU: 141GB VRAM H200 SXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 700W)
H200 SXM 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1980MHz
More VRAM (141GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4800GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
16448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075
1.028 TFLOPS
H200 SXM +6417%
67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Nov 2023
Tesla
Generation
Hopper
Professional
Type
AI GPU
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1590 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1980 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
141GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
384bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
4800GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
132
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
16896
56
TMUs
528
48
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1045 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1979 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
67 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GH200
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Hopper
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
4 nm
3 billion
Transistors
80 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
814 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
700W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1100 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
9.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy