Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm +1305%
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jan 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
112
224
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
78W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy