Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock924MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE +1651%
1.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
823 MHz
-
Boost Clock
924 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

6
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
48
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GM204
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy