Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Intel Arctic Sound-M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
7424 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1163MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound M +725%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2016
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8192
Shading Units
768
256
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy