Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
7648 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +19094%
13.82 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 580
0.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Apr 2009
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
32
240
TMUs
16
120
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
72.00 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
G96C
-
GPU Variant
G96-875-C1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
40W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy