Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (200W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 640.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 +71%
23.65 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1050 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
320bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
640.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

56
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
7168
Shading Units
7680
224
TMUs
240
96
ROPs
120
224
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

158.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
369.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
23.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
23.65 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
369.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
8 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy