RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVS 3100M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM NVS 3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores
NVS 3100M Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+26176%
12350
NVS 3100M
47
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
2
3072
Shading Units
16
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.424 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.848 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
46.98 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
14W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
N10M-NS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
