Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 122W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+459%
12350
GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
2209
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2012
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
1536
96
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.01 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.03 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.209 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.03 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
122W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N13E-GTX2-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
