Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon E9175 PCIe

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon E9175 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9175 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 65% (2010MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +889%
12350
Radeon E9175 PCIe
1248

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2017
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
1124 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
512
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
50W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
E9170
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net