RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs FirePro M5800
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2672 additional rendering cores
FirePro M5800 Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+2275%
12350
FirePro M5800
520
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
400
96
TMUs
20
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
26W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Madison
-
GPU Variant
Madison XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0