Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 128MB VRAM Mobility Radeon X1600 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2007
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
M5x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.67GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
-
96
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.592 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.592 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
M56
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0