RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce GTS 260M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 260M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2976 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTS 260M Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+4578%
12350
GeForce GTS 260M
264
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
12
3072
Shading Units
96
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
38W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GS
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
