RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Radeon E2400
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
3032 additional rendering cores
Radeon E2400 Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+25629%
12350
Radeon E2400
48
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
24
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
40
96
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
25W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
RV610
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0