Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1400MHz vs 1150MHz)
384 additional rendering cores
Iris Plus Graphics 650 Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
+143%
2150
Iris Plus Graphics 650
883
3DMark Time Spy
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
+134%
1292
Iris Plus Graphics 650
551
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
+139%
612
Iris Plus Graphics 650
256
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2017
HD Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1400 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
6
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.900 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
4.301 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1.766 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
883.2 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
220.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
15W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Alder Lake GT1
GPU Name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Generation 12.2
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm
Process Size
14 nm++
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
