NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs Intel H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 63% (2520MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
17664 additional rendering cores
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+3801%
92.9 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2020
GeForce 40
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
768
576
TMUs
48
192
ROPs
24
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
300W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
DG1
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
5 nm
Process Size
10 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
609 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
