NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 620 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 14.37GB/s)
18384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+59451%
92.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 620 OEM
0.156 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2012
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
898 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
14.37GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
1
18432
Shading Units
48
576
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
30W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GF119
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
