NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs ATI FirePro V3900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
17952 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+14787%
92.9 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2012
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
144
SM Count
-
18432
Shading Units
480
576
TMUs
24
192
ROPs
8
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
800W
TDP
50W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Turks
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
