NVIDIA TITAN Ada vs NVIDIA P104 101
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada and 4GB VRAM P104 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (2520MHz vs 1683MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 256.3GB/s)
15872 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P104 101 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 800W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN Ada
+978%
92.9 TFLOPS
P104 101
8.617 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2018
GeForce 40
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
1683 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.15TB/s
Bandwidth
256.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
144
SM Count
20
18432
Shading Units
2560
576
TMUs
160
192
ROPs
64
576
Tensor Cores
-
144
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
107.7 GPixel/s
1452 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
269.3 GTexel/s
92.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
134.6 GFLOPS
92.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.617 TFLOPS
1452 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
269.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
800W
TDP
125W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GP104
AD102-450-A1
GPU Variant
GP104-101-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
16 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
