NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
6464 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (400W vs 900W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
GRID A100A
+1251%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2020
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
108
448
Shading Units
6912
56
TMUs
432
48
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
900W
TDP
400W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
