Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 8GB VRAM Quadro P4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 243.3GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (105W vs 235W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
Quadro P4000 +34%
5.304 TFLOPS
Blender
Tesla K20Xm
372
Quadro P4000 +25%
468
OctaneBench
Tesla K20Xm
63
Quadro P4000 +39%
88
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Feb 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1202 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1901 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
243.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
2688
Shading Units
1792
224
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
94.72 GPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
82.88 GFLOPS
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.304 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
GP104-850-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

235W
TDP
105W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy