NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
13696 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+1232%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Jan 2023
Tesla
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
249.6GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2688
Shading Units
16384
224
TMUs
1024
48
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
164.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
3.935 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
1312 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
235W
TDP
2400W
550 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
100 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
