Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M +61%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy