NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA GRID K340
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K340 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K340 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
+81%
1.332 TFLOPS
GRID K340
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
