Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1036MHz
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro M2200 Mobile +106%
2.122 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2017
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
695 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1377 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
88.13GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.15 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.30 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.122 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.30 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GM206
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

247W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy