NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (238W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
+29%
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jul 2011
Tesla
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
16
448
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
238W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GF110
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
3 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
