Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro M4000M +142%
2.496 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
1280
56
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.496 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GM204
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
N16E-Q3-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

238W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy