Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050 +709%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
G94
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

238W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy