Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1380MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +76%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
1260 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

26
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
3328
Shading Units
5120
104
TMUs
320
48
ROPs
128
104
Tensor Cores
640
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GV100
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Volta
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
12 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.0
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy