NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1306MHz vs 1200MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+377%
7.987 TFLOPS
GRID M3 3020
1.672 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro Ampere
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
1033 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
640
104
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
GM107
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)
