NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+1628%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
24
3328
Shading Units
192
104
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
24
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
GT200B
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
12 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
