NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+390%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro K4100M
1.627 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
1152
104
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
32
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.94 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.78 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.627 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.78 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
GK104
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
N15E-Q3-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
