CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
Categories
English
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
VS
NVIDIA RTX A2000
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 0System Shared VRAM Quadro FX 470 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
3312 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000
+17648%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 470
0.045 TFLOPS
NVIDIA RTX A2000
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 470
Graphics Card
Aug 2021
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Type
System Shared
192bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
26
SM Count
1
3328
Shading Units
16
104
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.640 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
38W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA106
GPU Name
C79
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
-
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile
2
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB
7
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
8
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050
9
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
10
NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
Related News
1
AMD Quietly Launches the 5500X3D Processor
2
Intel's All-Big-Core Processors Are On the Way
3
AMD Unveils Future Plans: Introducing Zen7 Architecture and MI500 Series
4
AMD Set to Evenly Compete with Intel in the Server CPU Market
5
AMD Launches New Instinct MI350 AI Accelerator
6
NVIDIA Plans to Launch Next-Generation Rubin Accelerators in September
7
AMD Unveils New Zen5 Processor
8
TSMC Completes Trial Production of 2nm Process with an Impressive 90% Yield
9
Intel Confirms Nova Lake Processors, Adopting 14A Process Technology
10
NVIDIA is Preparing to Launch a Gaming Laptop APU Equivalent to the 4070
© 2025 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy