NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 119% (1687MHz vs 771MHz)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+143%
8.637 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A2000 Mobile
+137%
4917
Quadro K5200
2072
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
RTX A2000 Mobile
+201%
2836
Quadro K5200
941
Blender
RTX A2000 Mobile
+317%
1222
Quadro K5200
293
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2014
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
48
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
