NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1687MHz vs 1335MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (20W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
+57%
8.637 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded
5.468 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A2000 Mobile
+87%
4917
RTX A500 Embedded
2628
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2022
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
435 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
16
2560
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
64
20
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GA107S
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
