Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA P106M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA P106M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM P106M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA P106M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (1291MHz vs 1207MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q +107%
6.18 TFLOPS
P106M
2.974 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2019
Ampere-MW
Generation
Mining GPUs
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

682 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
9
2560
Shading Units
1152
80
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-505-KC-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net